Blind pilots are able to fly IFR on networks such as Vatsim using our screen readers, and programs such as talking flight monitor, community driven projects that read our FMC,, panels and instrumentation in popular aircraft such as the pmdg series. As a result, we are able to fly with accuracy and precision once airborne. We are unable to taxi the aircraft at this moment in time since the necessary taxiway data is not exposed to talking flight monitor according to the developers of this project.

We therefore will kindly ask to reposition to the runway threshold when our time comes in the departure flow. Some blind pilots may request to pushback, whilst others will reposition directly from the gate. The decision is often made dynamically depending on traffic levels, since we cannot see where the pushback system is taking us.

Blind pilots will note the need for the reposition in the flight plan remarks. If a controller reads and notes this, it’s helpful to let us know that you will coordinate with other relevant sectors when we obtain IFR clearance. If we do not have this indication, we will likely drop a private message to the relevant sectors, such as ground and tower, to notify them of our requirements.

We are able to accept CPDLC messages without issue as well. If a blind pilot requests a CPDLC through the Hoppie ACARS system, we will include a copy of our flight remarks in the comment section of the IFR clearance request.

We do not ask for any special treatment and are happy to wait for our slot in the departure flow. If it seems prudent to have a blind pilot use a differing runway to accommodate our request however we are also open to this.

We are unable to reposition to given holding points, and thus we will appear directly on the runway. The reposition itself will only take a matter of seconds and so there is no expected delay for traffic that may be holding behind us.

Regarding traffic alerts, Talking Flight Monitor does have a traffic radar system which allows us to view other aircraft. We will be unable to confirm visual contact with these aircraft and increased guidance from the controller, especially if a conflict with other aircraft is possible, would be appreciated given our situational awareness may be slightly degraded.

We are unable to accept visual approaches, and will often advise the approach controller of our request on first contact especially if it appears as though visual approaches are acting as the primary approach for other pilots in the area.

Blind pilots also prefer ILS approaches where possible since the aircraft can provide more automatic guidance down to the runway, whilst RNAV and other non-precision approaches often have higher minima with the expectation that the pilot will have sighted the runway. We are able to perform RNAV approaches, all be it with the potential for slightly less accuracy on touchdown. A blind pilot may therefore request an ILS approach to a runway that is not the primary arrival runway, if the winds are suitable for such a request and if traffic flow permits. We will however be happy to attempt other approaches if an ILS is not possible and generally anticipate these attempts having a high success rate.

Some pilots may choose to disconnect after rollout, whilst others may request to reposition over to a stand. Again this is often a dynamic decision made based on current perceived workload for the controller.

Overall, us blind pilots have flown on vatsim for many years, participating in large events such as Cross the Pond, Cross the Land, and everything in between in various continents. Whilst each individual has a differing skill level, we pride ourselves on always giving our best on the network. Certainly, having the screenreader speaking along with ATC can be challenging, but the skill of separating out these various auditory inputs is something we gain over time. It is thanks to the cooperation of controllers such as yourself that we are able to participate along with thousands of sighted pilot counterparts to enjoy our hobby to the greatest extent despite some of the limitations we face technically.